[no subject]

And we WILL go round and round and round....

RHC


"alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oMx8f.111553$lq6.12548@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1130519626.016163.162020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> As long as you continue I'll invoke the SFB ASA rules of engagement.
>>
>> This is an ALT Newsgroup. You don't control what I or anyone else does
>> here. If you don't like it you can leave.
>
> Uh, it seems you should take your own advice.
>
>> When you learn to keep you COMMENTS to yourself and keep your AGENDAS
>> out of the group, then I'll do the same. If you want it your way and
>> then oppose someone else who does the same, it will continue.
>
> Again, see above.
>
>> All you've got to do is keep it technical, and germain to the groups
>> charter and intention.
>
> Or what? You'll stomp and kick and throw a fit?
>
>> NOW ...... on a new note:
>>
>>  It's quite possible that NOW we can make this group what it was
>> intended to be.  Stay within reasonable bounds of what you know the
>> intention of this group was, back in the beginning and it'll be really
>> nice here. It's possible that SFB will not return. This could be the
>> opportunity that all of us has been seeking for a long, long time. If
>> you choose to continue this, you can be absoutely sure of one thing
>> ...... I won't start it but if you do, I won't just let it go. You
>> can't break the rules and expect that someone else isn't allowed to do
>> the same. And if someone does break the rules I think that in order to
>> keep the group sane, it is incumbant upon the others to come down on
>> the offender .... en-masse. If that isn't done, it will become the free
>> for all that it has been for years. I'll abide by the "groups" rules
>> just as anyone else does. But everyone has got to come to the agreement
>> that we're going to keep the group in control as a "group". It's got to
>> be quite obvious to everyone at this point, that ignoring instigators
>> and disruptors doesn't work. There is a social contract that can be
>> reached here. ALT Newsgroup conduct is only a reality if we let it be.
>> We've all seen the worst of it here. Can we use this possible
>> opportunity to clean up this act and make it what it could be or is
>> everyone just going to let it continue to be what SFB made it.
>>
>> This seems to be a good point to end all of the garbage that has
>> existed here.
>>
>> If there's any agreement here .....maybe someone would like to start a
>> new thread so that this can be discussed in a new venue.
>>
>> Anyone interested in trying to make a new start here?
>
> Who the hell do you think you are, gramps? You don't run anything here but
> your mouth. Maybe you should step back and take a good honest look at
> yourself. But no, you won't. You never grew up. You're what seventy? You
> behave like an eight-year-old. Not many here are willing to take direction
> or admonition from you, of all people.
> js
> js
>>
>
>