[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PIR with tamper

Subject: Re: PIR with tamper
From: "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 03:10:56 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <d6bes1$9q4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xkbie.1550$nv1.2988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <kNhie.1386170$6l.848384@pd7tw2no> <Fwnie.5$gl1.2046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <%3Pie.1407715$Xk.370037@pd7tw3no> <nMSie.33$lK.5043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Crash Gordon®" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nMSie.33$lK.5043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
They're not ridiculously expensive, Optex makes one that's very reasonable.

True.  I don't recall using the term "ridiculous" and I prefer using the
Paradox line of PIR's.  Anti-masking detectors aren't something we can use
when most commercial systems we quote successfully on are for customers that
are looking for the "cheapest price".  All our commercial jobs use detectors
with tampers and employ end-of-lines...

References:
- PIR with tamper
  - From: Yongil
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Crash Gordon®

Prev by Message: Re: 22. Are you an OLD or a NEW VICTIM of wireless alarm systems
Next by Message: Re: NX8E and Shabbat
Previous by thread: Re: PIR with tamper
Next by thread: Re: PIR with tamper
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home