[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PIR with tamper

Subject: Re: PIR with tamper
From: "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 22:11:07 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <d6bes1$9q4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xkbie.1550$nv1.2988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <kNhie.1386170$6l.848384@pd7tw2no> <Fwnie.5$gl1.2046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Crash Gordon®" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Fwnie.5$gl1.2046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> It would have helped a little. When the anti-masking
> pir sensed it was obscured it would have sent a trouble
> to the cs even if system was disarmed.

> But...yah...letting an unidentified person work on your
> alarm system is kinda dumb too.


PIR's that employ "anti-masking" technology are expensive.  It's rare to see
them even quoted althought some customers may require the technology
(jewelry stores, banks, and other "high risk" type occupancies).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Crash Gordon®

References:
- PIR with tamper
  - From: Yongil
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR with tamper
  - From: Crash Gordon®

Prev by Message: Re: Compass - direct connect?
Next by Message: Re: Alarm Frequency Snooping
Previous by thread: Re: PIR with tamper
Next by thread: Re: PIR with tamper
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home