Re: PIR with tamper

[Crash Gordon® <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

They're not ridiculously expensive, Optex makes one that's very =
reasonable.


"Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:%3Pie.1407715$Xk.370037@xxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> "Crash Gordon=AE" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
> news:Fwnie.5$gl1.2046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > It would have helped a little. When the anti-masking
> > pir sensed it was obscured it would have sent a trouble
> > to the cs even if system was disarmed.
>=20
> > But...yah...letting an unidentified person work on your
> > alarm system is kinda dumb too.
>=20
>=20
> PIR's that employ "anti-masking" technology are expensive.  It's rare =
to see=20
> them even quoted althought some customers may require the technology=20
> (jewelry stores, banks, and other "high risk" type occupancies).
>=20
>=20
>=20
>