[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 22. Are you an OLD or a NEW VICTIM of wireless alarm systems



Well, then Paul would be the biggest Fish Flooder on the net then =
wouldn't he.

"Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:A6Gme.9695$qJ3.3485@xxxxxxxxxxx
> It sounds like a British slang term. I can only guess that it means =
"don't=20
> waste your time". Since fish live in water, flooding them would be a =
big=20
> waste of time... :)
>=20
> Jim Rojas
>=20
>=20
> "Crash Gordon=AE" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
> news:6Nxme.68$gi2.11909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jim, any idea what "flood the fish" means? Paul is such a =
maroon...sheesh.
>=20
>=20
> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
> news:ZPtme.12713$tv3.4788@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Mikey, don't waste your time with this guy. He has been polluting =
Usenet=20
> > for
> > years with his endless dribble. He will never understand. All we can =
do is
> > sit back and let the clown do his dance routine.
> >
> > Jim Rojas
> >
> >
> >
> > "mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:auOdnVhl7Oqm0QffRVn-tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > <-pull@shoot> wrote in message
> > > news:2rki915vkrlhpe4rlplcui3iipnn8n6uc2@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >>
> > >> Are you an old or will you be a new VICTIM of wireless alarm
> > >>  systems wrong advertisements and sellers talk?
> > >>
> > >> Wireless alarm systems fail during Radio Frequency Interferences =
(RFI)
> > >> without warning to the owner or CS and nothing can prevent it.
> > >>
> > >> TEST YOURS if you have one, get a FCC/CE approved transmitter...
> > >>
> > >> :For all frequency types of wireless alarm systems:
> > >> www.mipot.com
> > >> http://www.aurel.it/
> > >> www.rfsolutions.co.uk
> > >>
> > >> OR
> > >>
> > >>  Ask "so called" professionals to explain you why wireless alarm
> > >> systems are reliable and how they avoid RFI, the well known =
nuisances
> > >> of low power radio wave reception.
> > >
> > > Interference is avoided by repeatingly sending the signal across =
an FM
> > > band
> > > comparable in "width" to the FM band on your radio. That's a lot =
of
> > > frequencies to jam or otherwise have interference. One of the =
multiple
> > > signals is
> > > bound to get through and it only takes one.
> > > Because there's no wire (or EOL), the transmitter has to send =
check-in
> > > signals
> > > to ensure it is able to report an alarm (supervision).
> > > If the receiver doesn't see the check-in signals, it complains to =
the=20
> > > poor
> > > sap carrying
> > > the pager.
> > > So, it seems we're doing the best we can where it's unrealistic to =
use
> > > wire,
> > > Paul.
> > > If you have a better idea, I'd like to hear it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >=20
>=20
>


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home