Re: News: Wrong security code

["Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:t8Sdnc1PSeLeRq7fRVn-hA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Y5idnWYuKL0uVa_fRVn-2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > "J. Sloud" <jsloud2001@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:hsp431pd5e2nli8mte2abcjm9n7qf30272@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:30:06 -0500, "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >I agree. It wasn't a dig at ADT at all. But it provides a few of us
> with
> > > >some training examples.
> > > >The example I would, and did point out to my CS staff is what a
cancel
> > code
> > > >does.
> > >
> > > My reply was a defense of the entire industry.  The fact that ADT was
> > > the central is irrelevant.  It would have happened the same way
> > > regardless.  From reading the article and not having access to all the
> > > facts, it appears that the correct code was entered after the
> > > allowable time had elapsed for a cancel.  ADT's monitoring system is
> > > very automated, and there is very little room for operator error.
> >
> > J, does ADT even use cancel signals? I'm just asking an honest question.
> > I agree, there are obviously a few missing facts.
>
> Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't
>
I didn't see anything on their web site about cancel signals, just their
"enhanced call verification".
What's your typically policy on cancel signals Mark? Do you guys use them?
Or anybody for that matter.