[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: We need a narrower thread.

Subject: Re: We need a narrower thread.
From: "Mel" <Respond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:27:30 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <%TD1e.15$207.382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42470f84.55296562@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <TGG1e.815585$Xk.194235@pd7tw3no>

I would suggest using a 4-40 instead of a 12-28.

Bob

"Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:TGG1e.815585$Xk.194235@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Si Ballenger" <shb*NO*SPAM*@comporium.net> wrote in message
> news:42470f84.55296562@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:31:56 -0700,
>> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Crash_Gordon=AE?= <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Type anything:
>>
>> H
>> o
>> w
>>
>> i
>> s
>>
>> t
>> h
>> i
>> s
>> ?
>
>
> That's pretty damn narrow, Si...
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: We need a narrower thread.
  - From: Crash Gordon®

References:
- We need a narrower thread.
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: We need a narrower thread.
  - From: Si Ballenger
- Re: We need a narrower thread.
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: Interesting...
Next by Message: Re: Inspection Technicians
Previous by thread: Re: We need a narrower thread.
Next by thread: Re: We need a narrower thread.
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home