Re: We need a narrower thread.

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

or...220/221...whatever it takes! :-)


"Mel" <Respond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:d2813j$31at$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I would suggest using a 4-40 instead of a 12-28.
>=20
> Bob
>=20
> "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message=20
> news:TGG1e.815585$Xk.194235@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Si Ballenger" <shb*NO*SPAM*@comporium.net> wrote in message=20
> > news:42470f84.55296562@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:31:56 -0700,
> >> =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Crash_Gordon=3DAE?=3D <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Type anything:
> >>
> >> H
> >> o
> >> w
> >>
> >> i
> >> s
> >>
> >> t
> >> h
> >> i
> >> s
> >> ?
> >
> >
> > That's pretty damn narrow, Si...
> >=20
>=20
>