Re: Window Security Recommendations

["Robert L Bass" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I seen them. I know who and why the whole thing got started.

I do too.  The e-mails, al;ong with the false accusations of murder, etc.,
all came from this newsgroup.  Some of the garbage they tried to use was
also quoted from Sabodish's hate website.  I showed the rest of it to the
state investigator.  It took him about 15 minutes to realize the complaint
was bogus.  It took even less for him to consider Mugford's behaviour
totally inappropriate.

> I know who contacted Neely for information...

Toole, another pal of Mugford's.

> who happens to be the ED of the AAF and not
> a state employee...

Yes, I got that wrong at first.

> to find out if you were a member and...

I read his reply.  It was a bald-faced lie.  One of the nice things about
these idiots is they can't help making up garbage.  It made it easy for the
investigator to see what a crock of jiminex they were pushing.

> Member support is one of Neely's jobs...

So now "member support" includes accusing non-members of murder?  What kind
of jackass did you guys elect?

> Not to file complaints, but if asked a
> question by a member, he will answer it...

Without even bothering to check that what he's saying is utter nonsense.
Very nice.  Next time you see him, tell him what a fool he played by quoting
lies from Sabodish, Mugford and a few other jerks without checking first.

> After all he works for the membership...

Do the job requirements include passing on malicious lies about non-members?

> The call was directed to me because
> of my knowledge of who's who in the
> State. After a discussion about who you
> are and what your main focus is, the
> party dug further into your website,
> got a copy of your monitoring agreement
> and filed a complaint with the DBPR.

I saw the complaint.  It was based on a deliberate misreading of the Florida
statute.  The complaint was dismissed because they presented no evidence of
wrong doing -- only false accusations which did not stand up to the light of
day.

> That is where Reddinger came into play.
> I've known about it for awhile.  Can't stop
> someone from persueing what they
> believe...

They knew all along the law is on my side but decided to give it a shot
anyway.

> Also seen your post accusing Mugford
> of instigating it...

You're darned right he did.  He's friends with everyone else that was
involved and they cited the same false accusations he has made.  I know you
and he are friends but you really ought to open your eyes about this guy.
He's a sneaky, conniving liar and he'd cut your throat (metaphorically, one
hopes) in a minute if he thought it would gain him anything.

> If in fact there would have been a problem
> arise out of your situation, as I have said
> before, it wouldn't go in front of Mugford
> or the Board he sits on...

That isn't the point.  He used his personal relationship with Toole and
Neely to get them to do it for him.  No way was he going to hang his name on
it since he knows that would come out immediately.

> The ECLB does not handle unlicensed activity...

Nothing I do requires a license.  Mugford knows that.  You know it.  So did
Toole and Neely but they went along with it on Mugsy's behalf.

> I know he likes to bust your balls...

Probably because he hasn't any himself.

> If Reddinger was the one that actually
> came to your home, which would
> suprise me, and you showed him your
> archieves of posts from Mugford, if he
> was "aghast", believe me he was
> placating you...

Possibly.

> He has heard and seen it all with the
> sort of people he has to contend with...

I'm sure he sees some pretty disgusting jerks -- like those two idiots from
upstate NY who they caught doing unlicensed roof repairs.  He should expect
the worst among those types.  But a state board member is not supposed to
act like a total jackass in public the way Mugford does.  We're not supposed
to have Mugs McGinnis presiding over the ECLB.

> I know her superior that knock it down
> because of the way the statute is worded...

Uh-huh.  In other words, the law doesn't require a license for what I do.
It never did because that was not the intent of the legislature.  They have
no interest in regulating services provided out of state by third party
vendors who are also located in other states.  Their concern is regulating
businesses which service and monitor alarms in Florida.  I don't do that so
I guess you could say that the "way the law is worded" exempts me.  That was
the conclusion of the person who investigated the phoney complaint.  That
was also the opinion of the SA in charge.  Funny how things have a way of
working out just right no matter what these [persons of questionable
parentage] try to do.

> (loosely) and that the complaint was to pointed.

Nonsense!  The law is quite specific about what is and what is not
regulated.  The complaint was bogus from the start.  Don't forget I have a
verbartim copy of everything these slobs submitted.

> Being active legislatively, I know there is
> a rewrite of the Statute to get it up to
> speed with how business is being done
> these days but that will be a slow pains
> taking task...

There's nothing in the offing about regulating out-of-state activities, even
those of business whose offices are located in Florida.

> Did your situation go RL? Yep.

My "situation" didn't go RL.  Mugford went RL, using his pals in the state
association to try to cover his butt.  If you believe otherwise you're
kidding yourself.

> But it didn't have anything to do with
> any posts or discussions from this NG
> or anyone that has ever posted here.

Perhaps you didn't see the "evidence" these morons submitted.  Included were
several posts from this newsgroup.

> Trust me.

I do but you're mistaken about Mugford.  He's much worse than you think he
is.