Re: 34. Why my multiple posts about wireless un-reliability?

["Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

After 4 years of endless dribble, we can safely say that Paul's brain is
still not immune to RFI. It's time to take the headphones off Paul. Maybe
one of us "PROS" can send you a tin foil lined hat to block all the unwanted
RFI.

Yes Paul, there is a life beyond RFI...

Jim Rojas

<-pull@shoot> wrote in message
news:gq8ab1lqsoiftmgo693357sjihh1ed02o6@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> I'm fed-up with innocent victims of unprofessional alarm sellers who
> hide reality.
>
> NO QUALIFICATION PRE-REQUISIT REQUIRED to be a so called pro..
> How less they know, how less they have moral problems to sell
> wireless equipments.. ease of installation.. they just have to BLUFF
> non initiated and impress them.. not very difficult.
>
>          Wireless IS unreliable.
>
> Pro's KNOW it, BUT those so called PRO's prefer to make smoke curtains
> by diverting from the subject in an attempt to generate uncertainty
> and fear in order to put my statements in doubt.
> Business and financial interests obliges... NOT THE OWNER PROTECTION
> concerns.
>
> Is there a so called pro who can explain WHY wireless alarm systems
> are reliable?
>
> Why do manufacturers not publish all the goodies, the specification on
> theyre wireless involved items?
>