[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Camera Suggestions

Subject: Re: Camera Suggestions
From: "RF Dude" <post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 21:12:11 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <2228c15vh6167dp6ultgu5142aieb08cng@xxxxxxx> <0aa9c1t3d7qh2n454as09hj8jhab7u340t@xxxxxxx> <dFxxe.7140$Ai.788830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dqhdc1po9a0erggpd9okp183n7d894ntb2@xxxxxxx>

Yes, detected, but I think the original discussion was about identification.
What is the make and model?  Alas, it would be overkill for my simple
thermography applications.

Depends what wavelength you are looking for.  I'm working 7 to 14 microns.

"J. Sloud" <jsloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dqhdc1po9a0erggpd9okp183n7d894ntb2@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> The cameras I had in mind offer .03C-.08C thermal resolution with a
> pixel resolution of 640X480.  Depending on the field of view selected,
> humans can be detected at a distance of at least 4500m.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Camera Suggestions
  - From: J . Sloud

References:
- Re: Camera Suggestions
  - From: J . Sloud
- Re: Camera Suggestions
  - From: RF Dude
- Re: Camera Suggestions
  - From: J . Sloud

Prev by Message: Question: How to check anonimity claims of a newish P2P system
Next by Message: Re: Alarmforce backup
Previous by thread: Re: Camera Suggestions
Next by thread: Re: Camera Suggestions
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home