Re: Out of town

[Joe <joeraisin@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Your comment would be well received if there was any basis to it.

I do not recall any "previous comments" that could be considered a
"flame."  However, if you can remind me of such I will gladly concede
and consider myself appropriately chastized.

And you seem to be ignoring the original point.  You did make a
grammatical error that gave a somewhat humorous connotation to your post.

I can't envision anyone reading my response taking it as a "flame."


Robert L Bass wrote:
>>BTW, it was lite-hearted jab...
>
>
>  Considering your previous comments, it wasn't "light hearted" at
> all.  You like to flame.  You got flamed.  If that bothers you,
> change your own behavior or go away.  Either way is fine with me
> but please don't post drivel about light-heartedness.  Your
> disingenuousness is more offensive than your nasty personality.
>