[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550

Subject: Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:18:25 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <yz%rf.3902$l87.127220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yG%rf.3903$l87.128662@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_Nosf.1208$Yk2.142468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <akxsf.1296$Yk2.164748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <80zsf.211362$Gd6.50686@pd7tw3no>

"Frank Olson" <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:80zsf.211362$Gd6.50686@xxxxxxxxxxx
> R.H.Campbell wrote:
> > Correct on both points. Time to upgrade really. As the saying goes, you
> > wouldn't run your business on a 486; why run your security on the same
> > vintage of alarm panel...
>
>
> What's wrong with a 1550??  Is it going to communicate faster than the
> newer stuff??  Yes.  How much faster?  Maybe 5 seconds.

A typical 4/2 signal sends in roughly 45 seconds, CID or SIA sends in about
half that

> If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Agreed

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
  - From: Frank Olson

References:
- Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
  - From: ac
- Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
  - From: R.H.Campbell
- Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
  - From: ac
- Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
  - From: R.H.Campbell
- Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: anyone from Massachusetts or know alarm installation business ups/downs?
Next by Message: Let us remember Frank Olson
Previous by thread: Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
Next by thread: Re: Honeywell 60 / DSC PC1550
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home