[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: UL Required to get License

Subject: Re: UL Required to get License
From: "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:49:11 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <ay3lf.52865$s92.24258@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133835319.803272.126250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133842995.893933.305380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0Uglf.45077$i7.19527@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133926377.551911.209520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If thats really the case then the three systems that you keep going on about
would also have fallen foul of the law since you have repeatedly stated that
the customer hired electricians to install the systems.

Doug L

--

<robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133926377.551911.209520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> The new rule allows a UL listed firm (or the building owner) to do the
> installation.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: Frank Olson

References:
- UL Required to get License
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: mbbaker@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: robertlbass
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: robertlbass

Prev by Message: Re: DSC 5010 Communication Problem
Next by Message: Re: Girsh Alarm in Philly, PA lousy treatment of potential employee
Previous by thread: Re: UL Required to get License
Next by thread: Re: UL Required to get License
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home