Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system

["Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

"Mike Sokoly" <secure15@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:s3vQe.19323$KX7.3803@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Frank Olson wrote:
>> "Nick Markowitz" <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:ZDsQe.5912$fP.2426@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>doing a complete replacement with sk 5700 system
>>
>>
>>
>> Then you've "covered", Nick.  It's obvious you've already considered the
>> old "Pyro" panel uses addressable devices.  The 5700 isn't ULC approved
>> as yet (at least I haven't seen it in Canada).  From the manual, many of
>> the modules have the same "footprint" as the System Sensor ones, only
>> they're using dip switches to set the address.  Are they, in fact, made
>> by them, or is "SK" doing something completely different??
> Frank,
> SK devices that are addressable are "encoded"- smokes and Heats- by the
> control panel- but relays , input modules, pull stations are dip switch
> addressed, as well as BUS devices such as keypads, expanders etc
>  Mike S.

Wow...  That's sounds very similar to Edwards Signature series devices.
I'll have to read up on the 5700 some more...  Thanks, Mike.