[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system

Subject: Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system
From: "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 02:05:38 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <5nOPe.123$j41.31@trndny05> <DTkQe.324716$s54.274663@pd7tw2no> <ZDsQe.5912$fP.2426@trndny08>

"Nick Markowitz" <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ZDsQe.5912$fP.2426@xxxxxxxxxxx
> doing a complete replacement with sk 5700 system


Then you've "covered", Nick.  It's obvious you've already considered the old
"Pyro" panel uses addressable devices.  The 5700 isn't ULC approved as yet
(at least I haven't seen it in Canada).  From the manual, many of the
modules have the same "footprint" as the System Sensor ones, only they're
using dip switches to set the address.  Are they, in fact, made by them, or
is "SK" doing something completely different??

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system
  - From: Mike Sokoly
- Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system
  - From: Doug L

References:
- ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system
  - From: Nick Markowitz
- Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system
  - From: Nick Markowitz

Prev by Message: Re: Adding a third keypad to a Caddx NX-8, wiring help requested!
Next by Message: Re: Communique
Previous by thread: Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system
Next by thread: Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home