Re: ?? on Cerberus pyrotronix addressable system

[Mike Sokoly <secure15@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Frank Olson wrote:
> "Nick Markowitz" <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ZDsQe.5912$fP.2426@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>>doing a complete replacement with sk 5700 system
>
>
>
> Then you've "covered", Nick.  It's obvious you've already considered the old
> "Pyro" panel uses addressable devices.  The 5700 isn't ULC approved as yet
> (at least I haven't seen it in Canada).  From the manual, many of the
> modules have the same "footprint" as the System Sensor ones, only they're
> using dip switches to set the address.  Are they, in fact, made by them, or
> is "SK" doing something completely different??
>
>
Frank,
SK devices that are addressable are "encoded"- smokes and Heats- by the
control panel- but relays , input modules, pull stations are dip switch
addressed, as well as BUS devices such as keypads, expanders etc
  Mike S.