[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: For Robert

Subject: Re: For Robert
From: Joe <joeraisin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:01:16 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <b0iKe.169029$5V4.13163@pd7tw3no> <qiflf159uqmk61v9rg3b3oplar4e3v7fo9@xxxxxxx> <KeKdnUfkzKSqWmffRVn-jA@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1oilf1pv0sl2ekga2teg5j2odra53ui632@xxxxxxx> <UeudnZ2dnZ0ZIh-UnZ2dnXNRZ9-dnZ2dRVn-zp2dnZ0@xxxxxxxxxxx> <8k3rf11qav6n7ohm957erdrrnnrvt9mili@xxxxxxx> <muidnZ2dnZ3JrvKvnZ2dnXsvYN-dnZ2dRVn-yZ2dnZ0@xxxxxxxxxxx> <8e10g1t81nn1rbeivge3fhvnedhe7mu4ek@xxxxxxx> <EImdnfcWfafeYGLfRVn-pA@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1f2dg11o1e58q9htl2tkep52g2vi7jktmj@xxxxxxx>

Robert L Bass wrote:

>>You are the one who keeps bringing up the
>>"fact" that the "testimony" was altered not me
>
>
> I didn't know that you'd been altered.
>

Actually, in this case, while there is a comma missing, (perhaps you
could loan him one of the ones I sent you) it doesn't give the sentence
that particular connotation.

BTW, you haven't mentioned it, but have you realized that you initially
mistook me for someone else?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- For Robert
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: For Robert
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Reporting codes
Next by Message: Re: Napco Wireless???
Previous by thread: Re: For Robert
Next by thread: Re: For Robert
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home