[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CCTV Cameras

Subject: Re: CCTV Cameras
From: "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:08:04 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1125088738.040920.255630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <DpydnWtl5tuDPpLeRVn-uQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1125157491.809403.279110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <qJednQZxDsIWV43eRVn-1Q@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1125177621.794174.223390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Socrates" <londonlinks@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125177621.794174.223390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> We'll all be quite low soon in our retirements- 6' under. Then there
> won't be any communication with any world, or any need for cctv.
>
At least you have a good sense of humor.

I think most here understand what you're saying.
I'm sure the quality is quite good, however the application is extremely
limited. Probably more so as a video badging station for access control
cards, not so much surveillance applications. Might even be good in the
automation processing world. Just not practical as a CCTV replacement.
Best of luck.

References:
- CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates

Prev by Message: Re: Wireless receiver - computer problem?
Next by Message: Re: lack of support at Home Technology Store
Previous by thread: Re: CCTV Cameras
Next by thread: Re: CCTV Cameras
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home