Re: An absurd situation

["petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am not sure how to read your last post Mikey..

was that irony or you just catched up something?


"mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
dMCdnX4AmJ8F95_eRVn-hA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:8TbMe.24688$tb4.777207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de
> news:
>> Kq2dnQbgQsYuj5zeRVn-2w@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Yeah, seems you could be right for sure! Now there is such a bias in
>> > the
>> > Federal Government, that it almost seems "French language" comes first,
>> > and English comes second, even in areas where French isn't even common.
>> > Forget about being promoted unless you are fluent in French; they'll
>> > promote a less capable candidate if they speak French over a better
>> > qualified one who doesn't speak French. That's how our Armed Forces has
>> > become filled at the upper ranks with "armchair warriors".....
>> >
>> > I'm all for a bilingual government, but that's definately NOT the way
>> > it
>> > was supposed to work out in practice.....:((
>> >
>> > RHC
>> >
>>
>> The same apply here.. If you are not bilingual,dont ever think climbing
>> in
>> the company higher level..
>> A bozo that can speak english
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH it never occured to me that it could
> happen the other way around too hahahahahahahahaha, thanks, petem
> ahahahaha, suffer, buddy.
>
> will more likely become my boss then a clever
>> and highly qualified administrator speaking only french or english..
>>
>>
>>
>> > "mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:u4ydnZ2dnZ2HWr-CnZ2dnUONnN6dnZ2dRVn-052dnZ0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> This just goes to show you that it is not always about money, Bob.
>> >>
>> >> I've seen this favouritism from both sides all my life. French prefer
>> >> French, English prefer English, it will never change. That idiot
> Trudeau
>> >> did
>> >> us NO favours at all with his ill-conceived bilingualism policies, it
> DID
>> >> NOT work.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>