Re: Jury duty revisited.

[joe <nospam@xxxxxx>]

Robert L Bass wrote:


> On a lighter note, I spoke to a buyer from an outfit in Milford,
> CT, today.  He thought we were distributors.  I explained that I
> sell to the public and referred him to a distributor in his area.
> We got to talking and I asked if he had ever run across any jobs
> from Milford Alarm.  He said they were the worst installations
> he'd ever seen, bar none.  I told him how the jackass that ran
> that outfit snookered the state license authority -- telling them
> he was doing "home improvement" so he wouldn't have to pass the
> alarm license test or the background check.  He laughed and said
> that the word "'improvement' was misleading advertising."
> Knowing the kind of belligerent jerk he is, I'm not at all
> surprised.

yea right.
what does that have to do with jury duty!
but knowing what kind of belligerent jerk you are, I'm not at all
suprised you'd make up more lies and spread them about someone else.