[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: cs handshaking

Subject: Re: cs handshaking
From: "buco" <emurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 5 Aug 2005 11:54:39 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1121965692.727608.166540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <11e0ntu8r5hl257@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1122037807.698569.69410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vS6Fe.7$OQ3.220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1122648315.803220.262380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <RICGe.89$ab6.1824@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Crash, is this true for ul sites, if the cp not responing does not
generate an alarm at the cs then what pervents crooks from just
knocking out the cp and any backup alarm transmission signals?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cs handshaking
  - From: Crash Gordon

Prev by Message: Re: Jury duty revisited.
Next by Message: Re: Jury duty revisited.
Previous by thread: Chubb Windsor 500 engineer code software
Next by thread: Re: cs handshaking
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home