[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CO2 detector question

Subject: Re: CO2 detector question
From: "Group Moderator" <GroupModerator@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 05:03:32 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1114010565.265004.162340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2dCdnd0MU7Y-6vvfRVn-tg@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4jG9e.1086155$Xk.346822@pd7tw3no> <6OOdnZgPj-29xPrfRVn-uQ@xxxxxxxxxxx>

"Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6OOdnZgPj-29xPrfRVn-uQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> CO detectors (like four wire smokes) should be
>> considered a "life safety" device.  I'd strongly
>> suggest a power supervision relay (and companion
>> EOL) be considered as integral to any CO
>> detector circuit...
>
> Good point, Frank.  Thanks for mentioning that.

> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
>


Mike Said:
Smooooch, Smooooch , HUGS & KISSES......

References:
- CO2 detector question
  - From: TheAberdeenKid@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: CO2 detector question
  - From: Robert L. Bass
- Re: CO2 detector question
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: CO2 detector question
  - From: Robert L. Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Lufkin Security Experiances
Next by Message: Contact ID
Previous by thread: Re: CO2 detector question
Next by thread: Re: CO2 detector question
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home