Re: Door Access Control With Good E-mail Interfaces

["pcbutts1" <pcbutts1@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sharpvisions dvr will do it and send a picture with every notification.
http://www.seedsv.com/svseries.htm

--


The best live web video on the internet http://www.seedsv.com/webdemo.htm
Sharpvision simply the best http://www.seedsv.com



"Will" <DELETE_westes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:GdKdnV6EbvO7-sLfRVn-hg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Is there a door access control system with fine-grained support for e-mail
> or pager notifications for specific events?    We have been using Ademco
> Passpoint, but I have problems with this:
>
> 1) The software doesn't run as a Windows service, so if you reboot the
> server it doesn't automatically startup the software that needs to be
> running to have e-mail notifications work.
>
> 2) There are no time periods for e-mail notifications.   For example, I
> would like to know about all entries after hours and on weekends at the
> moment they happen.   Passpoint makes you get all entries or no entries,
> and
> nothing based on time of day.
>
> 3) Passpoint appears to be a dead-end product for Ademco.   The software
> hasn't been upgraded in ages and they have lots of different control
> systems
> now that seem to compete with it.    I'm feeling a lack of direction
> there.
>
> 4) Many of the Ademco events that trigger notifications are borderline
> gibberish, mainly triggers for very low-level technical things in the
> alarm
> or door access panels.   They just didn't think through how people would
> want to use and interface to event notifications.
>
> Cost is an issue.    I want the best price-performance ratio that meets
> the
> basic requirements for good Windows server integration and real-time
> notifications of events.
>
> Other requirements that would be nice to have (but not essential) for the
> door access system:
>
> 1) Ability to use the same badges to access workstations and unlock a
> screensaver.
>
> 2) Ability to unlock file cabinets.
>
> Are there any systems that meet my requirements better than Passpoint?
>
> --
> Will
>
>
>