Re: Current mid-range technology?

[Russ in San Diego <russgoog@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jun 17, 8:50=A0pm, Steve Fenwick <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article
> <f847316d-6300-4421-8a14-6ea5f9cd0...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> =A0Russ in San Diego <russg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 9, 10:29=A0am, nob...@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston) wrote:
> > > Russ in San Diego <russg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > >I was describing some of my X-10 setup (installed many years ago, wh=
en
> > > >X10.com was heavily promoting the stuff, and you could get tons of i=
t
> > > >REALLY cheap) to a contractor friend. =A0He seemed very interested i=
n
> > > >knowing about it for other customers. =A0I warned him that he probab=
ly
> > > >ought to stay away from selling X-10 to customers, because it's so
> > > >dicey and unreliable. =A0I'm ok with it for my usage, but I wouldn't
> > > >feel comfortable recommending it to a non-hobbyist who can't handle
> > > >the fussiness and frustration.
>
> > > >Any recommendations as to what's a reasonably priced and reasonably
> > > >reliable equivalent technology these days? =A0Is Insteon significant=
ly
> > > >better than X-10? =A0What else is out there?
>
> > > Insteon reliability is good but it's pricey compared to X10 (and it s=
eems to
> > > be a bmoving target with new devices being introduced to 'fix' earlie=
r
> > > flaws. You should also look at UPB (again, pricey) and ZWave (I'm not
> > > impressed). You should also be aware of Jeff Volp's XTB devices - I h=
aven't
> > > kept up with revisions - they boost X10 signals to about 25-30Vpp whi=
ch most
> > > who've tried it say makes X10 nearly 100% reliable.
>
> > Thanks for the summary! =A0I hadn't been aware of the XTB stuff, and it
> > looks pretty handy for my purposes. =A0I'll pass along the information
> > on Insteon, UPB, and ZWave.
>
> > The reason I'm reserving judgment on XTB is that, while it ought to
> > ensure devices turn on or off when commanded, I don't see how it would
> > help with one of the worst X10 problems, that of devices switching on
> > or off when NOT commanded, i.e., after having recognized a code within
> > line noise.
>
> > Now, if devices required a stronger minimum signal -- that might
> > mitigate the problem -- but that's not a centralizable solution such
> > as that provided by the XTB-IIR..
>
> I'm happy with UPB in a remodel I recently did, but I knew in advance to
> have all the lighting circuits placed on the same phase, along with a
> couple of outlets in various places for CIM access. In another house
> with random wiring, I have the usual noise and opposed-phase problems. I
> have tried the plug-in phase coupler (unsuccessful); I have yet to try a
> breaker box phase coupler. I haven't had false commands in either
> situation, just lost commands.
>
> Powerline remains a troubled communication medium, but UPB does seem to
> be way ahead of X-10.
>
> Steve
>
> --
> steve <at> w0x0f <dot> com
> "Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
> arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to
> skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, chip shot in the other, body tho=
roughly
> used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"


While looking into UPB, I found my way over to SmartHome again (a UPB
outlet), and noticed that they seem to be pushing Insteon pretty
heavily. Any consensus on it?  SmartHome seems to be claiming that
it's most reliable of any of the technologies, while cheaper than UPB
(although more expensive than X10).