[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reviving the xPL Schema definition discussion
Howdy,
> XSDs seemed to be the way to go for this, despite the fact that xPL
> messages are not XML, it still appeared to be possible to define the
Hmm, not sure I agree. XSD is pretty good at describing XML documents
themselves, but having written a few XSD documents for our integration
projects, I really don't think it would be a good fit for something that is
more flat like xPL.
I can see how it could be done, but I think it's probably not a real
natural
fit. I'm not sure what benefits we'd get by tring to make it (most the
benefits from XSD seem to evaporate when you not really describing a fully
hierarchical XML document). Perhaps you could elaborate a bit -- maybe
that could help me see it from another perspective.
Gerry
--
Gerry Duprey
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
http://www.cdp1802.org
xPL Main Index |
xPL Thread Index |
xPL Home |
Archives Home
|