Re: xplrionet/xplmedianet

[Richard Malcolm-Smith <rich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Xplrionet is dead in the water, but the design of xplmedianet means
stuff
> like this should be easy to add (providing they can be done!)
>
> Unfortunately work and personal issues are keeping me from finishing
> xplmedianet at the moment (a shame as it's so nearly complete) but I
will
> get back to it asap as I want to use it! Once it is released it'll be
easy
> to add new music (or video/picture) sources - simply a case of
dropping in a
> new dll.
>
> Haven't had a great deal of feedback on the xplmedianet release I made
to a
> few people, so not sure if that's because it's shite or because it's
fine -
> or more likely, like me, they don't have the time to test either.
>
> Unfortunately I think it'll be at least another few weeks before I can
even
> think about getting back to it
>
> Regards
> Tony

How slow should xplrionet take to index songs, looking at the logs, its
taking
about a min per directory, and each only has one album in it. CPU is pegged
at
100% with it all being xplrionet and lan utilization to the machine with
the
mp3s is near zero


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]