Re: Re: xPLRioNet - The Vote - THE RESULT - Sort of...

["Rob West" <xplworld@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm still on the "Option A" side of the fence!

Rob.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Tofts" <tony@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_xpl] Re: xPLRioNet - The Vote - THE RESULT - Sort of...


>
> Hi all,
>
> With 2 more votes cast, the vote closes with a tie of 7.5 votes for
each
> option...
>
> Therefore the winner is .... Drum roll .... Neither!
>
> I currently have a hacked about xplrionet playing one of my own
problem
> mp3's thru riot (the trio client) with no skipping...
>
> So, my decision is that:
>
> 1) 'A' wins if we drop the existing client and use riot
>
> 2) 'B' wins if we decide not to use riot
>
> How to decide?
>
> Well riot has the advantage of playing the problem files, but as we
don't
> have the source code for riot 0.1.6 we would have to work within the
> existing confines. i.e. TTS may be delayed slightly, and we can't add
client
> side functions (e.g. bass/treble, assuming this can be done anyway)
etc.
> Initially though there will be no synch, while I work out how it
works.
>
> Writing a new client will take a long time, though the riot stuff will
take
> some time too (but a lot less), but we will have the source code to
try
and
> make the requested mods and ensure quick tts response etc
>
> So can people please vote again stating A, B or C as follows:
>
> A) Action rio with riot client then do other stuff
>
> B) Action other stuff, and come back to a new rio client at a later
date
>
> C) Action other stuff, and implement riot/new client later (this is
for
the
> original 'B' voters)
>
> And fingers crossed we don't get 5 votes for each ;-)
>
> Thanks
> Tony



xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx