Re: Re: motion detectors: need some input

[Tom Van den Panhuyzen <tomvdp@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Steve,

That would indeed be useful.  I guess it is limited to 2 addresses
only ?  I suppose there are many cases when a condition triggers the
same command on multiple addresses.  It would limit the number of X10
commands and thus speed up things.

I tried to achieve it via xpl but without success.  I get arithmetic
overflows logged in the application log for those combinations of
house/device/data1/data2 that I think could work.

Maybe, one day when I feel strong enough, I will step through the code
with the debugger to see what is actually sent to the CM11.

Tom


On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:57:50 +0000, steve.cooper@xxxxxxx
<steve.cooper@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> One way to reduce the delay for each lamp would be to send the two
device
> codes and then send an X10 on. Rather than each one in turn, if the
CM11
> xPL code supports extended codes.  They should then come on together.
>
> This will only work if the units are on the same housecode.  Here is a
link
> that gives more details.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3mesm
>
> S.
>


xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx