RE: Re: long HDMI 1.4 cable problems

["Dean Smith" <dean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Surely in the case of HDMI 1.4 - it does explicitly impact the cable.
The
Cable needs to support the additional Ethernet Connectivity channel
introduced.



Any increase in bandwidth (such as the increase to 4k2k resolution for 1.4)
will place greater demands on data cabling and expose cheaper cable
manufacture or shielding. 10.2Gb/s is a not insignificant bandwidth on
copper cable. So again "1.4 support" should imply the shielding
etc has been
tested at those higher data rates.


Dean



From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Neil Ball
Sent: 15 December 2011 22:58
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: long HDMI 1.4 cable problems





You should be looking for a high-speed HDMI cable, the numbering scheme
(1.4
etc) relates to features of the HDMI chipset and has nothing to do with
cables. This is rated to achieve 10.2Gb/s which covers 3D, full HD audio
and
4k2k resolution for future proofing.

If you are looking for reliability then I would suggest going for a branded
cable providing costs are not too horrific, or look for a HDMI booster to
clean up the signal at the display. Cheap unbranded cables are unlikely to
have any testing so their performance is likely to be hit and miss. If you
want to talk to a company who supply good quality HDMI equipment and who
can
give excellent support then speak to Joe or John at The Media Factory - I
use their Octava HD-Base-T extenders in all of my installs now as they are
100% reliable and work over distances of upto 100m, and all over a single
good quality Cat5e cable. For "proper" HDMI cables I now either
use
Wireworld high-speed flat cables or Sanus highly flexible high-speed
cables.
However I would only go upto 5m with such a cable, after that I prefer to
use baluns with Cat5e.

Neil B.

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On Behalf
Of
Phil Harris
Sent: 15 December 2011 21:07
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: long HDMI 1.4 cable problems

I've used 15m eBay "cheapies" at 1080p without issues ... but not
at 3D.

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On Behalf
> Of Gary Tall
> Sent: 15 December 2011 19:58
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: long HDMI 1.4 cable problems
>
> I've had success over 15m and 8m too. The 15 I can't remember the make
> but it was an expensive cable. The 8m is QED, given the choice I'd use
> this again.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On Behalf
> Of Paul Gale
> Sent: 15 December 2011 10:49
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: long HDMI 1.4 cable problems
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, you'll likely have all kinds of problems over 5-8m or so (opinion
> varies). I recently went through a load of problems similar to you - I
> bought loads of supposedly good HDMI cables (v1.4 with Ethernet
> capable) from a web supplier HDCable. In the end I sent everything
back
> (they had great cust service though) including a matrix switcher and
> HDMI over Cat5 extenders and bought some much more expensive QED
> cables. The QED cables were significantly thicker but obviously had
> better shielding. All works fine now with none of the picture/signal
> dropout that I had before.
>
> BTW - my longest run was only 5m too!
>
> I also had huge problems with kit not handshaking properly/at all with
> the lower priced cables.
>
> Being so used to scoffing at all the snake oil claims out there for
> analogue cables, the problems I had with HDMI came as quite a surprise
> - in this case buying expensive cables actually is worth it IMO.
>
> Oh, and my kit is a Panasonic 50" TX-P50GT30, a Pioneer VSX-LX55
and a
> Pioneer 3D bluray player. The 3D connection/recognition between the
> player/amp/TV was the most problematic - all solved now though.
>
> These are the cables I went with:
>
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0045D0ER2
>
> I think the 10m cables are pretty expensive though. Also lots of
people
> out there suggesting you really need an active cable with signal
> booster for cable runs over 5-8m (I read up a lot but opinion varies)
-
> guess it's partly down to kit, cable quality, shielding and placement
> near other RF noisy stuff.
>
> Paul.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On
> Behalf Of JonS
> Sent: 14 December 2011 22:43
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: long HDMI 1.4 cable problems
>
> Sorry, 10m
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
, "Phil
> Harris" <phil@...> wrote:
> >
> > Can't see a length anywhere?
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On
> > > Behalf Of JonS
> > > Sent: 14 December 2011 22:02
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] long HDMI 1.4 cable problems
> > >
> > > I've bought a pair of HDMI cables. 1 works fine the other
refused
> to
> > > work. I returned it for a replacement. The new cable works
> > > intermittently - dropping the picture and then after a while
> > > recovering.
> > > This is an 1.4 cable working between a Sony BD player and
samsung
> 3D
> > > TV when working on 3D. Its Ok for SD.
> > >
> > > Can anyone recommnend a cable that will work reliably at
this
> length
> > > for 3D - I'd like to get it installed under the floor &
carpet down
> > > before Christmas (this year!)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > JonS
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

<*> Join the Automated Home Forums
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/vbulletin/