RE: DIY Windows Home Server Build - JukeBox MkII

[Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Now should that be digged or dug?  ;)

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Dean Barrett
> Sent: 30 October 2009 12:38
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] DIY Windows Home Server Build - JukeBox MkII
>
> Yes - I thought it was a very good article too - and I digged it also
> :)
>
>
>
>
> Dean.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of
> Mark McCall
> Sent: 30 October 2009 11:10
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] DIY Windows Home Server Build - JukeBox MkII
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Simon Pawson
> <simonp.lists@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Very interesting article.
>
> Oh, and BTW, thanks for being the first person on UKHA_D to even
> comment on
> the article that took about two weeks to do.
>
> /me rolls eyes.
>
> M.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4557 (20091030) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4557 (20091030) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



------------------------------------