RE: Logitech Harmony one?

[Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks :)

Would like to get my hands on one to look at though - anyone know if these
(1000) are likely to be stocked/displayed by A/V retailers?

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Nigel Champion
> Sent: 13 January 2009 16:45
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
>
> Ahh yes sorry I was thinking of the 1000  opps :)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxx>
> To: "ukha_d@xxxxxxx" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2009 16:41:26
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
>
>
> That's the 1100 though - we were talking about the harmony one (unless
> you've heard about an RF version of that?)
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_d@yahoogroups. com] On
> Behalf
> > Of Nigel Champion
> > Sent: 13 January 2009 16:32
> > To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com
> > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
> >
> > http://www.logitech .com/index. cfm/remotes/
universal_
> remotes/devices/ 470
> > 8&cl=us,en
> > or http://tinyurl.
com/a6shxb
> >
> > Seesm to be a new one coming soon with RF
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > From: Neil Ball <neilball@btopenworl d.com>
> > To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com
> > Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2009 16:18:14
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
> >
> >
> > I have used one for a few days but the lack of RF meant it was
not
> > suitable
> > for me. As you say the lack of coloured buttons is the only real
> issue
> > in
> > terms of usability and not a major problem via the touchscreen,
it
> just
> > means you need to be on the right page an looking at the
touchscreen
> > when
> > you use them rather than getting the tactile feedback from
"real"
> > buttons.
> > If there was RF then I would happily use the "One" in
place of my
> 895.
> >
> > Neil B.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_ d@yahoogroups. com] On
> > Behalf Of
> > Paul Gale
> > Sent: 13 January 2009 16:01
> > To: 'ukha_d@yahoogroups .com'
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
> >
> > Have you used or got one Neil?
> >
> > Lack of coloured hard buttons is the only down side most people
were
> > complaining about (although you get them on the touch screen)
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_ d@yahoogroups. com] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of Neil Ball
> > > Sent: 13 January 2009 15:57
> > > To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
> > >
> > > It is not a bad replacement for the 885 although as it does
not
> > support
> > > RF
> > > then it is only of benefit for line-of-site control or use
with a
> 3rd
> > > party
> > > IR extender system.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Neil B.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   _____
> > >
> > > From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_ d@yahoogroups. com] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of
> > > Paul Gale
> > > Sent: 13 January 2009 14:38
> > > To: 'ukha_d@yahoogroups .com'
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyone got one of these as an upgrade/additional remote over
the
> > > 885/895
> > > etc?
> > >
> > > I was just wondering how they compare - buttons look better
laid
> out?
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus
> > > signature
> > > database 3761 (20090113) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset. <http://www.eset. com> com
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus
> > > signature database 3761 (20090113) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset. com
> > >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus
> > signature
> > database 3761 (20090113) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.
com
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus
> > signature database 3761 (20090113) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.
com
> >
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3762 (20090113) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset. com
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3762 (20090113) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3762 (20090113) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


------------------------------------