[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logitech Harmony one?
http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/remotes/universal_remotes/devices/4708&cl=us,en
or http://tinyurl.com/a6shxb
Seesm to be a new one coming soon with RF
________________________________
From: Neil Ball <neilball@xxxxxxx>
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2009 16:18:14
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
I have used one for a few days but the lack of RF meant it was not suitable
for me. As you say the lack of coloured buttons is the only real issue in
terms of usability and not a major problem via the touchscreen, it just
means you need to be on the right page an looking at the touchscreen when
you use them rather than getting the tactile feedback from "real"
buttons.
If there was RF then I would happily use the "One" in place of my
895.
Neil B.
-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_d@yahoogroups. com] On
Behalf Of
Paul Gale
Sent: 13 January 2009 16:01
To: 'ukha_d@yahoogroups .com'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
Have you used or got one Neil?
Lack of coloured hard buttons is the only down side most people were
complaining about (although you get them on the touch screen)
Paul.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_d@yahoogroups. com] On
Behalf
> Of Neil Ball
> Sent: 13 January 2009 15:57
> To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
>
> It is not a bad replacement for the 885 although as it does not
support
> RF
> then it is only of benefit for line-of-site control or use with a 3rd
> party
> IR extender system.
>
>
>
> Neil B.
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_d@yahoogroups. com] On
Behalf
> Of
> Paul Gale
> Sent: 13 January 2009 14:38
> To: 'ukha_d@yahoogroups .com'
> Subject: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
>
>
>
> Anyone got one of these as an upgrade/additional remote over the
> 885/895
> etc?
>
> I was just wondering how they compare - buttons look better laid out?
>
> Paul.
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
> database 3761 (20090113) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset. <http://www.eset. com> com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3761 (20090113) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset. com
>
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature
database 3761 (20090113) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset. com
------------ --------- --------- ------
------------------------------------
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|