Re: Logitech Harmony one?

[Nigel Champion <nigel_champion@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ahh yes sorry I was thinking of the 1000  opps :)




________________________________
From: Paul Gale <groups2@xxxxxxx>
To: "ukha_d@xxxxxxx" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2009 16:41:26
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?


That's the 1100 though - we were talking about the harmony one (unless
you've heard about an RF version of that?)

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_d@yahoogroups. com] On
Behalf
> Of Nigel Champion
> Sent: 13 January 2009 16:32
> To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
>
> http://www.logitech
.com/index. cfm/remotes/ universal_ remotes/devices/ 470
> 8&cl=us,en
> or http://tinyurl.
com/a6shxb
>
> Seesm to be a new one coming soon with RF
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: Neil Ball <neilball@btopenworl d.com>
> To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2009 16:18:14
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
>
>
> I have used one for a few days but the lack of RF meant it was not
> suitable
> for me. As you say the lack of coloured buttons is the only real issue
> in
> terms of usability and not a major problem via the touchscreen, it
just
> means you need to be on the right page an looking at the touchscreen
> when
> you use them rather than getting the tactile feedback from
"real"
> buttons.
> If there was RF then I would happily use the "One" in place
of my 895.
>
> Neil B.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_ d@yahoogroups. com] On
> Behalf Of
> Paul Gale
> Sent: 13 January 2009 16:01
> To: 'ukha_d@yahoogroups .com'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
>
> Have you used or got one Neil?
>
> Lack of coloured hard buttons is the only down side most people were
> complaining about (although you get them on the touch screen)
>
> Paul.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_ d@yahoogroups. com] On
> Behalf
> > Of Neil Ball
> > Sent: 13 January 2009 15:57
> > To: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
> >
> > It is not a bad replacement for the 885 although as it does not
> support
> > RF
> > then it is only of benefit for line-of-site control or use with a
3rd
> > party
> > IR extender system.
> >
> >
> >
> > Neil B.
> >
> >
> >
> >   _____
> >
> > From: ukha_d@yahoogroups. com [mailto:ukha_ d@yahoogroups. com] On
> Behalf
> > Of
> > Paul Gale
> > Sent: 13 January 2009 14:38
> > To: 'ukha_d@yahoogroups .com'
> > Subject: [ukha_d] Logitech Harmony one?
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone got one of these as an upgrade/additional remote over the
> > 885/895
> > etc?
> >
> > I was just wondering how they compare - buttons look better laid
out?
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus
> > signature
> > database 3761 (20090113) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.
<http://www.eset. com>
com
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> > ------------ --------- --------- ------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus
> > signature database 3761 (20090113) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.
com
> >
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
> database 3761 (20090113) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset. com
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
>
>
> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3761 (20090113) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset. com
>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 3762 (20090113) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset. com



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------