The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: New lighting wiring



Thanks Marcus



Am I right in thinking that you can't run low energy light bulbs on an
LD11?
Even though all I would be doing is turning them on and off?



Also, if I use something like XAP and Floorplan, am I right in thinking
that
it wouldn't be able to tell what state the AD10 / LD11 are in i.e. on or
off?



Thanks

Neil



From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Marcus Warrington
Sent: 17 January 2008 10:52
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] New lighting wiring



I have most of my lights on LD11 Din modules and did start to use an
AD10 for the bathroom lighting but found that the *LOUD* CLUNK that the
AD10 makes could be heard all over the house (even though it was mounted
in an enclosure in a cupboard!). Quickly replaced with an LD11.

I did try a micromodule which although it was much quieter also has some
issues, mainly that the switching wire is low voltage unlike the
AD10/LD11 and so it was more difficult or impossible to install as a
simple replacement for the AD10

Rather than run new wires to behind the bed you could use a stick on
remote switch that works via RF (battery operated) and talks to a plugin
TM13 receiver unit that then passes on the X10 signal to the LD11 unit.

Marcus

________________________________

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On Behalf
Of Neil Frost
Sent: 17 January 2008 10:31
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] New lighting wiring

Great thanks should be straight forward then

From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
] On
Behalf Of K.
C. Li
Sent: 16 January 2008 16:35
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:ukha_d%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] New lighting wiring

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, frostie2001uk wrote:

> I'll be using AD10s as i have to use low energy bulbs (SWMBO
> requirements) There will be a switch on the wall in the normal place,
> which will be a momentary type (yes??).

For AD10, either an on/off or momentary switch would do. Have a look at
the technical diagram on our website to see how each is connected to the
AD10.

http://www.laser.com?laserlink=liad10
<http://www.laser.com?laserlink=liad10>

> To add a further switch (behind the bed) would I just run another
> momentary switch the same as the first one?

Yes. One thing to bear in mind when running the local control wires is
that they should be as far away from other electrical wiring as
possible.
We have known a number of cases where induced current from nearby wires
were sufficient to activate the AD10/LD11 in question.

Regards,

Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx <mailto:li%40laser.com>  <mailto:li%40laser.com>
<mailto:li%40laser.com>
Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com
<http://www.laser.com>
http://www.cbus-shop.com <http://www.cbus-shop.com>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.