[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: HDMI Over CAT5 Gets Affordable
I find it really annoying that no one seems to differentiate between
the
1080p24 you get out of a bluray player, with the 1080p50 or 60 that is what
comes out of a deinterlacer/scaler - the first uses less bandwidth then a
1080i does, but is made out to be much more intense use of the cable.
-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Kevin Hawkins
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 1:54 AM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: HDMI Over CAT5 Gets Affordable
Another alternative - Belkin have announced a wireless full 1080p
solution - apparently working over 100 feet and offering exactly the
same uncompressed digital quality as the source but I think it's going
to be expensive (early on)
The chips they use (Amimon) are each capable of supporting 720p and
1080i and so to support 1080p they include two of them - it would have
been nice if this allowed two simultaneous channels of lower resolution
as I don't think there's much need/adoption for 1080p currently.
K
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|