The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] Wireless gateway and repeaters



Sorry - what I meant was I used a homeplug to extend my wireless by
using a=
n
AP in a different location, rather than a repeater.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Paul Gale
Sent: 17 August 2008 23:14
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Wireless gateway and repeaters

I'm not after Ethernet to those locations - I have structured Cat5
everywhere anyway - this is for devices such as laptop around the house and
iphone etc.

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf=20
> Of Alex Clark
> Sent: 17 August 2008 21:50
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Wireless gateway and repeaters
>=20
> Have you tried a 'homeplug' - Ethernet through your mains wiring. 
I'm=20
> finding them excellent, and even more reliable than wireless.
>=20
> Alex.
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf=20
> Of Paul Gale
> Sent: 17 August 2008 16:56
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Wireless gateway and repeaters
>=20
> Mmm - I see that my gateway is only =A333 now! It can be configured as
a=
=20
> repeater, so wondering if that would be my best bet?
>=20
> Paul.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > Of Paul Gale
> > Sent: 17 August 2008 16:44
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Wireless gateway and repeaters
> >
> > Thanks - looks like the range expander is still available - is
the
> one
> > you have a WRE54G?
> >
> > Any idea how much extra coverage it gives you in your situation?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of Gary Tall
> > > Sent: 17 August 2008 15:33
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Wireless gateway and repeaters
> > >
> > > I use a linksys G WAP and one of their extenders. My
situation is=20
> > > the reverse of yours, Node0 is downstairs and coverage is
good,=20
> > > upstairs can be poor so its hidden in a spare bedroom
with=20
> > > HomeVision turning it
> > on
> > > when the alarm detects movement upstairs and off an hour
after
> > movement
> > > was last detected.
> > >
> > > I know the extender I have is no longer available but it
works
> well,
> > > the only problem with this one is that it will only work
with WEP=20
> > > and not WPA, then again where I live this is not so much of
a=20
> > > problem.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of Paul Gale
> > > Sent: 17 August 2008 12:28
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] Wireless gateway and repeaters
> > >
> > > I've got my wireless gateway in my new node0 and this is
fine for=20
> > > the loft and upstairs. However, signal is poor downstairs. I
was
> > wondering
> > > what options I have for extending coverage - new gateway /
some
> kind
> > of
> > > repeater etc?
> > >
> > > It's a Linksys Wireless G access point.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus=20
> > > signature database 3362 (20080817) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset. <http://www.eset.com> com
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> > > ****       Computers You Carry          ****
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus=20
> > > signature database 3362 (20080817) __________
> > >
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > >
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus=20
> > signature database 3362 (20080817) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> > ****       Computers You Carry          ****
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus=20
> > signature database 3362 (20080817) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
>=20
>=20
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus=20
> signature database 3362 (20080817) __________
>=20
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>=20
> http://www.eset.com
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------------------
>=20
> **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> ****       Computers You Carry          ****
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------------------
>=20
> **** Sponsored By http://www.Berble.com ****
> ****       Computers You Carry          ****
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus=20
> signature database 3362 (20080817) __________
>=20
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>=20
> http://www.eset.com
>=20
=20

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signatur=
e
database 3362 (20080817) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
=20

------------------------------------


UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.