Re: 1-Wire network wiring

["Frank Mc Alinden" <frankmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chris

Im not sure if you can still purchase them but maybe Justins TOM10 Board
which allows you to connect up to 10 dallas 1 wire sensors.......

I use my own hardware to monitor dallas ds18s20 sensors using a cat5 based
system.....It currently allows you to connect 2 dallas ds18s20 sensors
toprobe 5 + 6 of  each zone box but my test probe system is now setup to
allow dallas sensors in any probe input or all..which means up to 64 dallas
sensors......

Heres a link to my Probe system......

http://www.armaghelectrical.com.au/page9.html

HTH
Frank



----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hunter" <cjhunter@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] 1-Wire network wiring


> From:   cjhunter@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] 1-Wire network wiring
> Date: 25 October 2007 07:28:23 BDT
> To:   ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>
> Brian -
>
> no answer here, I'm afraid, but am very interested in the answers, if
> anyone has them ... so 'thought I'd maybe prompt it again !
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 23 Oct 2007, at 20:41, Brian Smith wrote:
>
>> Sorry if this has been covered before but I've had a good search
>> through the
>> archives and can't find anything.  I'm looking for some advice as
>> to how
>> people have wired up their 1-wire networks.  I have a number of
>> temperature
>> sensors connected up via cat5 from each room to my node 0.  I
guess it
>> resembles a star topology and whilst it seems to work fine the
>> wiring is
>> less than elegant with a number of hacked cat5 fly leads from my
>> patch panel
>> joined together with a terminal block.  Does anyone have any cheap
and
>> cheerful suggestions as to how I could improve this as I want to
>> add some
>> more sensors and my current approach isn't what you'd call
>> scalable?  Also
>> does anyone have any experience on the number of devices that can
be
>> sustained without the use of a hub?  I've only got half a dozen at
the
>> moment but I'm probably looking to add the same again.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>