RE: Re: Punchdown bloack for Cat5e

["Paul Gale" <groups2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Rob,

After much googling and phoning, I seem to have found a system that suits -
may be of use to others with similar needs and it fully meets/exceeds Cat5e
specs for gigabit:

http://www.siemon.com/int/download/product-specsheets/uk/s110_S110-Connection-System_ss.pdf

What's more, it's fairly slim line, so can reduce the space needed a fair
bit.

Just waiting on prices ATM...

Paul.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Rob Mouser
> Sent: 02 July 2007 10:45
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Punchdown bloack for Cat5e
>
> Yes, but not on your scale. Just used the CAT5 cable extenders (Punch
> down in a little box) from CPC.
>
> I have a gigabit connection on these cables and it appears to work
fine
> but have no need/desire/time to see how many 'thingybits through my
> puts' I get :-)
>
> Could you do a test on a couple of lengths?
>
> Rob
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx on behalf of Paul Gale
> Sent: Mon 02/07/2007 10:38
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Punchdown bloack for Cat5e
>
>
>
> I'm still trying to find a solution to the problem though and drawing
a
> blank, even when phoning networking suppliers.
>
> What I really want is a high density punch down block like:
>
> http://www.startechtel.com/icc-110-hinged-wiring-block-1.html
>
> That I can connect the two cables together by punching them down
> together.
>
> It mentions high speed data but I couldn't see any specs relating to
> this and I haven't found anything in the UK yet.
>
> Has anyone moved a cabling cabinet and extended cables before?
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > Of Chris Hunter
> > Sent: 02 July 2007 08:27
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Re: Punchdown bloack for Cat5e
> >
> > Thanks ... pretty good, too ...
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > On 2 Jul 2007, at 08:09, Paul Gale wrote:
> >
> > > Well it maxes out over a single file transfer at around
35MB/s
> > > which is 293.6Mbps or 0.2936 Gbps - which is obviously more
than
> > > three times the effective transfer rate of 100Mbps Ethernet.
These
> > > transfer rates are limited by the disk subsystem max rates
of the
> > > PC's tested.
> > >
> > > Paul.
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>