RE: Re: Panasonic IP camera?

["Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Ian.

I already have a Geovision system and am looking for a P+T camera (maybe Z
too) to go in the kitchen to monitor the dogs at various times.

Really, I should be looking for an analogue P+T camera and link it to
Geovision - but all I've seen are quite big/bulky and ugly :(

The Panasonic cams looked quite good and discreet although I wont get them
integrated with Geovision.

Decisions....

Paul.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> ianh1000
> Sent: 06 January 2007 10:59
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Panasonic IP camera?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I have a wired version and it is not bad at all, works quite well
> when I am out on the road with my iPaq (stills only). It comes with
> some recording softare suitable for 1 camera FOC. It is not great at
> night, it can give a fair view of static things but if someone walks
> across the view you get very little detail.
>
> Regards
> Ian
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Paul Gale" <groups@...> wrote:
> >
> > Did you go for the wired or wireless version? 10/30 IIRC?
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of
> > > White, Peter
> > > Sent: 05 January 2007 16:05
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Panasonic IP camera?
> > >
> > > That was me, but I ordered it on a tight-wad super-saver
> delivery, so it's
> > > not here yet!  Due on Tuesday, though I'm away until Friday.
> > >
> > > Pete
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Paul Gale [mailto:groups@...]
> > > Sent: 05 January 2007 14:20
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [ukha_d] Panasonic IP camera?
> > >
> > > Who bought one of those P+T panasonic cameras the other day?
> > >
> > > What are they like?
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>