[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
Re: cheap wired AV link required
Can you get an RF signal out of the cable box and just run a length of
CT100?
Tim.
On 10/12/06, Paul Gordon <paul@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know the "proper" answer to this question is
"KAT5", but....
>
>
>
> My parents currently have a wireless video sender to get their cable
TV
> signal from the cable box at one end of the living room, over to a 2nd
> TV at the opposite end of the living room, and for numerous reasons
this
> is way less than satisfactory. I'd like to change it for a wired link
of
> some kind. Since it is just for a 2nd TV, *and* because my parents
just
> don't "get it" when it comes to AV quality, I know they
won't consider
> it worthwhile springing for KAT5, so I'm wondering if there are any
> (admittedly inferior) budget versions available? - I'm sure I recall
> seeing mentions in here before for various KAT5-a-like systems, which
> just use passive unbalanced signals... - even this is likely to be
> better than the quality currently being delivered by the wireless
link!
** Sponsored by http://www.BERBLE.com **
all the Cool Stuff, in one Place
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|