The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: HA server recommendation


  • Subject: RE: Re: HA server recommendation
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:22:22 +0100

I think I need to monitor performance for a while then. It's currently
dual 1GHz PIII. My main need is to get a new m/b as this one is a bit dodgy
+ get something quieter (fans) and maybe run cooler (although not sure how
hot the PIII's are).

Paul.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> marcrfuller
> Sent: 09 June 2006 11:56
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: HA server recommendation
>
> --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Craig" <craigc.lists@...>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Win 2K3 Server
> > > Exchange server
> > > Fileserver
> > > FTP
> > > .....
> > > So it does run a lot of apps and needs to be powerful
without
> > > generating a lot of heat and noise.
> > Not sure a 'powerful' server is required. I have a similar setup
+
> Homeseer
> > 2.0 on a 800Mhz/512Mb machine with software/OS mirroring, no
issues with
>
>
> I agree with Craig on this. I have a PIII 700 (PC not serveR) with
> 1gig of ram and 300gig IDE (not sata)
>
> It runs without problem....
>
> Windows Server 2003
> Exchange 2004
> Homeseer v2
> Geovision (4 CAM Recording 24x7)
> xAP stuff
> VOIP stuff
> DNS
> FTP
> DHCP
> Active Directory
> File Serving (including profiles etc)
>
> Does the lot basically. At idle it sits at 18% utilisation and even
> when busy it never goes neer 100%.
>
> Cheers
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.