The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Lacrosse WS-2300 weather station wiring


  • Subject: RE: Lacrosse WS-2300 weather station wiring
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:41:54 +0100

Kevin,

I'm just looking at getting one of these - did you get the wired sensors
working in the end?

Oh, and where did you buy it from?

Thanks,

Paul.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> kw1816
> Sent: 13 July 2006 09:56
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Lacrosse WS-2300 weather station wiring
>
> I bought one of these weather stations some time ago and finally got
> round to having a play with it yesterday. It comes with a base
> station and outside temperature, Rainfall and wind sensors which are
> either wired or wireless.
>
> I've had it running fine when connected with the supplied cables
> which are modem style 4 core RJ11 - RJ11. Great I thought - I'll
> just plug one end into the patch panel and the sensors into a handy
> cat 5 socket in the garage.  The plan was to just use normal RJ45
> link adaptors and plug the RJ11's into one side. My reasoning was
> that as long as I did the same each end then electrically it would
> be fine. The sensors are going to be too far away for the wireless
> RF signal to be reliable.
>
> As you might have guessed it didn't work :-(    I can get it to work
> with a short CAT 5 patch lead using the same adaptors but not
> accross the structured wiring. I'm wondering if the CAT 5 twists are
> having an effect on the signal. Any ideas ??
>
> Thanks
> Kevin W.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.