[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: What 50" Plasma?
Have you done much comparison in colour rendition and smearing - I see
an element of both on my screens (although the smearing effect is possibly
down to the MPEG compression I think on lower datarate channels). The
number of colours rendered is very noticeable - graduations in underwater
sea scenes for example (obviously more noticeable on SD material though).
Are current plasmas any better in this area?
Cheers,
Paul.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Neil Ball
> Sent: 03 December 2006 09:44
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] What 50" Plasma?
>
> That resolution is typical for 50" screens unless you go for a
1920x1080
> model (generally supporting 1080p) at a much higher price. As you
> mentioned
> before these screens are generally twice the price of
"standard" HD
> models.
> I've decided that the current price differential is too high at the
moment
> to justify a 1920x1080 model I my own case. That may change once the
new
> Fuji 50" model arrives next summer but I will have bought my
50" before
> then
> so it is somewhat academic unless SWMBO is feeling generous :-)
>
>
>
> Neil B.
>
> _____
>
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Paul Gale
> Sent: 02 December 2006 23:56
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] What 50" Plasma?
>
>
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> From the specs I see it's a 1366x768 pixel screen. Are there not
higher
> pixel screens around now - how do they compare?
>
> I may be in the market for another 50" screen early next year
(current
> Panasonic 50" will get retired to my office :) )
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ** Sponsored by http://www.BERBLE.com **
> all the Cool Stuff, in one Place
>
>
>
>
>
** Sponsored by http://www.BERBLE.com **
all the Cool Stuff, in one Place
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|