[Message Prev][Message
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message
Index][Thread Index]
RE: XP / Geovision / Intel-Mac
- Subject: RE: XP / Geovision / Intel-Mac
- From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:29:49 +0100
But the overhead for this kind of system is normally HUGE. I wouldn't
think performance of two very CPU intensive applications like Geovision and
an edit app would be particularly good - unless you had a quad 10GHz CPU!
;) If you've ever tried running the Microsoft virtual PC and a hefty app
(even on a fast machine), you'd know what I mean!
I run a video production company and we run several PC based edit machines
- it's one of the most demanding applications out there. Even basic edit
progs require a fair bit of grunt with the amount of data DV involves.
Paul.
-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim
Noble
Sent: 07 April 2006 09:10
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] XP / Geovision / Intel-Mac
Ward, David wrote:
> or maybe you could!?
> http://www.parallels.com/en/products/workstation/mac/
>
That would be one way. I didn't think virtualization support was coming
until Mac OS X 10.5/Vista...
Jim
UKHA_D Main Index |
UKHA_D Thread Index |
UKHA_D Home |
Archives Home
|