The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 4-way cat5 dataport - single gang



I and at least a few other people here have used Minitran. I've never had a
problem, and
never heard anyone else here say they've had a prbolem with them.

I have lots of those 4-way cat5 sockets on that page, and some of their
angled two-port
sockets. I've been very happy with them.

You do need a deep backbox though, more so with the 4 port sockets than the
angled 2 port
sockets.

HTH
Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Baker" <paul.baker@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:06 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] 4-way cat5 dataport - single gang


> Hi all
>
> Have been on and off this list for a while now but never posted.  I
have a small
> but growing network at home which includes an office.  Have picked up
some good
> tips here.
>
> I need a 4-way cat5 dataport in a *single* gang module (i.e. the size
of a UK
> single mains socket).  It needs to be single gang because that's the
size hole
> I have knocked out in the wall  :)  It's all wired and ready for
Pollyfilla-ing
> (courtesy of Dad!)  Most that I have seen so far are double gang. 
Have spotted
> one here:
> http://www.minitran.co.uk/pages/products/list.mhtml?ct=1&sc=4
> See "Mini5 Single Gang 4 Way Wallplate" about half way down,
but I have never
> heard of MiniTran before and was wondering if list members have any
other
> recommendations.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paul




___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.