The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Cbus XPL XAP


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: Serial connection over Cat5 getting corrupted


  • Subject: RE: Serial connection over Cat5 getting corrupted
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:17:17 +0100

Thanks for the replies everyone :)

The power supply, baudrate etc are all fixed in the computer.

I haven't tried running Rx and Tx over twisted pairs though - I'm not sure
=
which wires they're running on but I have a feeling they won't be on a
pair=
! I'll try that first.

Thanks!

Paul.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> David Yeend
> Sent: 13 July 2005 23:44
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Serial connection over Cat5 getting corrupted
>=20
> Certainly pairing the TX and RX with a ground shows an improvement in
> my experience. I can only think this is due to minimisation of cross
> talk, RS-232 is single ended and not balanced so you do not get the
> same common mode 'noise immunity' as with a technology designed for
> twisted pair, such as Ethernet or RS-485.
>=20
> I think it safe to assume that you already have the cat5 in place and
> want to use it - an alternative cable is probably least favourable. If
> 2 way comms is involved, status and control, and it is critical - i.e.
> you would like your fish to survive and loosing comms would reduce the
> likely hood of this, then I would not risk the possibility of 'just
> getting by' on cat5. In my opinion there are too many
> variables.....new sources of noise having unforeseen effects,
> degradation of the interface electronics leading to attenuated signal
> or jitter etc.
>=20
> My solution would be either purchase one of the MSS100s and have it
> talk to a virtual com port, or (being more sociable) purchase a pair
> and have them talk to each other and provide a physical RS-232 at Node
> 0. Alternatively use a pair of RS-232 to RS-485 converters and match
> the line technology to the wire in use.
>=20
> Good luck.
>=20
> David
>=20
>=20
> On 7/13/05, Paul Gale <groups@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I've just wired up my aquarium computer (RS232) via my structured
Cat5
> cabling back to node0. I guess there's about 10-15m in the run.
> >
> > The trouble is, I'm getting some corruption in the sent data =96
spurio=
us
> characters and line feeds missed off.
> >
> > Any ideas what I can do to improve the comms?
> >
> > Ta,
> >
> > Paul.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20



UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.