The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Re: Smart Metering Privacy


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT] Audio Ripping


  • Subject: RE: [OT] Audio Ripping
  • From: "Sullivan, Glenn" <gsullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:22:47 -0500


I second that suggestion... EAC with FLAC as an external compressor.

I spent quite a bit of time figuring out the right command line switches
to populate the FLAC tags, but EAC is at home... If anyone is interested
in the command line, let me know and I'll post it tonight.


Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I  MCDBA
David Clark Company Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben McCormack [mailto:ben@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:05 AM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Audio Ripping


Have you looked at any lossless compression formats?


With WAV each CD is going to take up 650Mb.

There are a number of lossless formats

FLAC

http://www.firstpr.com.au/audiocomp/lossless/


Ben

On 15 Feb 2005, at 15:59, Simon Brazier wrote:

>
> Having just lost nearly 90Gb of music files in a hard disk failure
> (the day after purchasing some backup software which had yet to be
> installed), and data recovery programs failing to recover anything,
> I've got to start encoding all of my CDs to hard disk again.
>
> I was thinking of doing them all to WAV this time for maximum quality.

> Anyone got any recommendations for a good CD to WAV ripper ? I've had
> a look through the archive and it's about 6 months since this was last

> mentioned so there might be newer solutions around.
>
> TIA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.