The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1TB Raid?



I asked the question when I bought it and I was told yes you could,=20
however I only installed 3 drives initially as a safegaurd so I could=20
create another seperate array if that info turned out to be=20
incorrect. Albeit at a high cost in that I would have two redundant=20
drives in the box.

Anyone else have experience of this?

Paul

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Dean Smith" <dean@e...> wrote:
> Paul
>=20
> Does the Promise Hardware/Drivers allow you to add an extra disk and
> incorporate the raid without losing the current Data ?
>=20
> i.e move from 3 Disk array (500Gb) to 4 disk array (750Gb) and=20
maintain all
> data
>=20
> Dean
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: paul_watkin [mailto:groups@w...]
>   Sent: 24 June 2004 14:52
>   To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>   Subject: [ukha_d] Re: 1TB Raid?
>=20
>=20
>   Hi chris,
>=20
>   I have recently built a 500gig Raid 5 array using the Promise
>   Supertrack (6Port IDE) card and 250Gig Maxtor Drives (3 off).
>=20
>   I went down the IDE route as Maxtor only offer 3 year warranties=20
on
>   some of the IDE drives and they were only a couple of quid more
>   expensie than 1 year warranty non server drives through PC World.
>=20
>   So far working perfectly I have bunged the drives in Icy Docks to
>   keep them cool and although it's in 19" rack case with
several=20
other
>   fans the noise isn't bad. Quiet CPU fan and Quiet PSU help a bit.
>=20
>   Have the headroom to go to 1.25TB should I ever need it
>=20
>   Cheers
>=20
>   Paul
>   --- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Chris Bond" <chris@l...>
wrote:
>   > Well sorta on topic for a change cos its for my HA stuff =3D)
>   >
>   > Just wondering the cheapest solutions people have found to
>   implement
>   > a 1TB Raid.
>   >
>   > Looks like 4 x 250GB SATA drives are about going to be about=20
=A3480.
>   > Im not sure about what case to host these in or what raid
card=20
to
>   go
>   > for, i'd want RAID5 minimum on it incase on of the drives go=20
tits
>   up
>   > and thats all my mp3's gone.  It also needs to be queit as=20
it'll be
>   > in my office.
>   >
>   > Phil found a nice firewire case that holds 8 ide drives, im
a=20
bit
>   > nervous in using software raid because of the data on
there.=20=20
SATA
>   > drives are only about =A32 more these days but offer better
speed,
>   > tider cables etc seems a more sensible choice than IDE.
>   >
>   > It would be nice if i had the option to upgrade by adding a few
>   extra
>   > 250GB drives at a later stage too, with RAID5 im taking
about=20
33%
>   > loss leaving about 670GB of space.  Then I can take it upto
a=20
true
>   > RAID5 1TB later on.
>   >
>   > The lacie 1TB bigger disk looks amazing value for money=20
considering
>   > its size and connections on it (works out at about =A3660),
but=20
once
>   > again its lacking RAID5.
>   >
>   > Any ideas or suggestions, without going OTT price wise -
ideally
>   i'd
>   > like to come in no more than =A3600-700 for the lot which
seems=20
hard
>   > considering all of the above.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
> --
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
>=20
>     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ukha_d/
>=20
>     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>=20
>     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of=20
Service.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.