The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Possible Automated Security solution?


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: X10 Motion detection


  • Subject: Re: X10 Motion detection
  • From: "Patrick Lidstone" <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:08:42 -0000

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "Harry Hendriks" <hja_hendriks@h...>
wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> I use Homevision + PIR's (standard) + X10 for light control. I
agree with
> other comments that the coming up of a light via a PIR and a
controller is a
> little bit slow, but we (so including my wife) are all very happy
with it.

You can improve the responsiveness by disabling the false-trigger
sensing on some PIRs - often this is a jumper-selectable feature on
hardwired PIRs, I have no idea whether X10 PIRs have something
similar. When used in a security context, PIRs typically only
generate contact closure if they see 2 or 3 hits within a given time
window. In an HA environment, false alarms are generally
inconsequential. Eliminating this need for multiple hits improves
responsiveness massively IME (hard to quantify exactly, but by
perhaps as much as 0.5s? I guess it depends on the PIR).

Patrick




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.